Property flipping vs buy-andhold: Which strategy wins?

86

Leonita Mhishi

THERE is a particular kind of ex­citement that comes with buying a property in Zimbabwe today. It begins with a WhatsApp message, a pho­tograph of a newly built house or stand, and the familiar promise: buy now, wait a little, sell later at a much higher price.

For some investors, this has become a business model.

For others, property is less glamor­ous. They buy a house, find a tenant, col­lect rent every month and wait. They may repaint it occasionally, replace a leaking roof, chase a tenant for payment and complain about municipal charges. Years later, they still own the same property.

The first group is flipping. The second is buying and holding.

So, which strategy wins in Zimba­bwe?

My answer is that buy-and-hold is likely to remain the more durable strat­egy for the ordinary Zimbabwean inves­tor, while flipping can produce spectacu­lar returns for those with superior market knowledge, access to distressed proper­ties and the patience to manage consider­able transaction risk.

The distinction matters because Zim­babweans have long treated property al­most as a religion. “Buy land” has been passed from parents to children as an investment commandment. In an econo­my where savings have repeatedly been battered by currency instability and infla­tion, bricks, mortar and land have under­standably acquired an almost emotional status.

But property is not automatically profitable simply because it is property.

The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe’s latest figures show just how much the macroeconomic environment has changed. Annual US dollar inflation was 3.12 percent in July 2026, while month-on-month US dollar inflation was only 0.28 percent. That relative stability is im­portant because a property investor can now think more clearly about whether an investment is genuinely producing a re­turn, rather than merely rising in nominal terms because everything else is becom­ing more expensive.

That is where flipping becomes more complicated.

Imagine a young Zimbabwean entre­preneur buys a house for US$100,000, spends US$15,000 renovating it and sells it for US$135,000. At first glance, there appears to be a US$20,000 profit.

But the spreadsheet does not end there.

There are conveyancing and trans­fer-related expenses, renovation over­runs, marketing costs, holding costs and the possibility that the property sits on the market for months. There can also be tax consequences. The Zimbabwe Rev­enue Authority says capital gains tax on specified assets acquired after February 22, 2019 is generally 20 percent of the capital gain, after allowable deductions.

That seemingly attractive US$20,000 can therefore become considerably smaller.

And this is the fundamental weakness of flipping: the investor needs the next buyer.

Buy-and-hold has a different mathe­matics.

Suppose that same US$100,000 property produces US$700 a month in rent. The gross annual rental income is US$8,400, or an 8.4 percent gross yield before expenses. If the property remains occupied for years, the investor has two potential sources of return: rental income and future capital appreciation.

Zimbabwe’s market already pro­vides examples of this income-oriented approach. Recent market analysis puts residential rental yields in Harare broadly in the mid-single digits to around 10 per­cent depending on the property and loca­tion, while emphasising that gross yields are reduced by maintenance, vacancies, rates, insurance, security and other ex­penses.

That distinction between gross and net return is one Zimbabwean investors desperately need to understand.

A property advertised as producing 8 percent is not necessarily putting 8 per­cent into the owner’s pocket.

The temptation to flip is understand­able because the country’s housing short­age creates a powerful structural argu­ment for property.

Zimbabwe’s national housing back­log has been estimated at more than 1.25 million units, with urban areas carrying much of the pressure. The Ministry of National Housing itself acknowledges a backlog above 1.25 million units and says densification will increasingly be­come necessary as land becomes scarcer.

The shortage means there will contin­ue to be people looking for somewhere to live.

That is the strongest argument for holding.

A well-located, legally compliant property in an area with employment, schools, transport, reliable infrastructure and growing commercial activity has a fundamental economic use. It can house a family. It can accommodate a profes­sional. It can provide a home for a return­ing diaspora Zimbabwean. It can become a small business premises.

A speculative property bought simply because “prices are going up” does not have the same protection.

There is another factor changing the equation: the diaspora.

Zimbabweans abroad have become an important force in the country’s prop­erty market. A 2026 analysis published by Propertybook, citing Reserve Bank data, said diaspora remittances reached US$2.45 billion in 2025 and estimated that diaspora buyers accounted for about 30 percent of luxury property transac­tions, up from 15 percent in 2022.

For a flipper, diaspora demand can be a blessing. A house bought cheaply in a developing corridor can potentially be renovated, packaged and sold to an over­seas buyer seeking a ready-made home.

But it can also create danger. If too many investors start buying purely be­cause they expect someone else to pay more tomorrow, property prices can disconnect from rental income and local purchasing power. That is when the mar­ket starts becoming speculative rather than productive.

Zimbabwe has seen this problem be­fore in different forms.

The latest property conversation increasingly acknowledges the gap be­tween asset prices and incomes. Proper­tybook’s market analysis has noted rental yields in the 5-7 percent range across property types, while other market esti­mates have placed some Harare residen­tial yields higher. The message behind the different estimates is more important than the precise percentage: investors should calculate yield rather than assume appreciation.

This is particularly important for young professionals.

A 30-year-old Zimbabwean who has saved US$40,000 may be tempted to put everything into a stand because a friend bought one for US$20,000 and sold it for US$35,000. But the friend may have been lucky. The new investor may dis­cover that the stand has title complica­tions, poor road access, inadequate water infrastructure or limited demand.

Property is local. Extremely local. A house in a mature neighbourhood with established infrastructure is not financial­ly equivalent to a cheaper stand several kilometres beyond the urban edge.

The country’s housing crisis also cre­ates opportunities that go beyond buying an expensive house in Borrowdale.

Knight Frank’s 2026 Africa report points to heightened demand for low-and middle-income residential units in Zimbabwe. It also notes that occupier demand in Harare’s commercial proper­ty market is shifting towards suburban nodes.

That should make investors rethink what “good property” means.

It may not be the most expensive house.

It could be a modest rental property near a growing employment centre. It could be a cluster unit close to transport. It could be a small commercial property serving a growing community. It could even be a properly serviced property in a developing suburb where infrastructure is improving.

The investor who buys such an asset and holds it may ultimately beat the in­vestor who repeatedly buys and sells.

Flipping, however, should not be dis­missed.

For experienced developers, build­ers and investors who understand con­struction costs, planning regulations and neighbourhood demand, buying an un­dervalued property, improving it and sell­ing it can create genuine wealth. But that is not passive investment. It is a business.

The flipper is effectively running a property company.

The investor must find opportunities before competitors, negotiate aggressive­ly, control construction costs, understand the legal position, manage contractors, market the finished property and exit be­fore the market changes.

And Zimbabwe’s property market has another complication: paperwork.

ZIMRA requires documentation in­cluding sale agreements, title deeds or cession documents and proof relating to improvements when processing capital gains tax matters. Property transfers also involve the Deeds Registry and convey­ancing process.

A bargain property with unresolved ownership issues is not a bargain.

For the average Zimbabwean, there­fore, the winning strategy is not neces­sarily the one that produces the biggest headline profit. It is the one that survives bad years.

Buy-and-hold offers that resilience.

A good property can generate income while the investor waits. It can appreciate over time. It can provide accommodation to family members. It can serve as collat­eral where appropriate. It can eventually become a retirement asset.

Flipping depends much more heavily on timing. And timing is something no investor controls.

The Zimbabwean property market is entering an interesting phase. US dollar price stability is improving, diaspora money remains significant, housing de­mand remains enormous and developers are moving into new urban corridors. But the same market faces affordability constraints, infrastructure challenges and a housing shortage that cannot be solved by speculation alone.

The real winners will therefore be those who stop asking, “How much can I sell this property for next year?” and start asking, “How much economic value can this property create over the next ten years?” That is a less exciting question.

But in investing, boring can be beauti­ful. For the Zimbabwean family building wealth slowly, the landlord collecting rent, or the diaspora investor planning for retirement back home, buying a sound property at the right price, maintaining it properly and holding it patiently may prove more rewarding than chasing the next quick flip.

The property flipper may win the ap­plause at the braai when he boasts about making US$30,000 in six months. The buy-and-hold investor may simply keep collecting rent. Ten years later, how­ever, the quiet investor may still own the house.

And that, ultimately, is the difference between making a property deal and building a property fortune.

l Mhishi is the Principal Registered Es­tate Agent at HSP REALTY and can be reached on +263 772 329 569 or via email at leonita@hsp.co.zw