Simbarashe Hamudi
ZIMBABWE’S mining tax regime contains one of the most technical but important revenue mechanisms in the Income Tax Act: the 23rd Schedule, which deals with the determination of additional profits tax in respect of a special mining lease area. This schedule applies to holders of special mining leases and is designed to ensure that where a mining project becomes exceptionally profitable, the State receives an additional share of the proceeds.
In a country where mining plays a major role in economic activity, export earnings and public revenue, the additional profits tax system reflects the continuing effort to balance investor incentives with national fiscal interests.
A special mining lease is generally associated with large-scale mining operations requiring substantial capital investment, long exploration periods and major infrastructure development. Such projects often involve high risks in their early stages, including geological uncertainty, fluctuating mineral prices and the need for expensive machinery, processing plants and supporting facilities.
For this reason, the tax law recognises that investors must first recover qualifying expenditure before being subjected to additional taxation. The 23rd Schedule therefore does not simply impose a tax on gross mining revenue. Instead, it creates a structured formula that measures the project’s accumulated cash position over time.
An “allowable deduction” generally refers to a deduction permitted under the 22nd Schedule in respect of expenditure incurred. However, the 23rd Schedule expressly excludes certain deductions from being treated as allowable deductions for its purposes. These include expenditure of a specified kind under the 22nd Schedule, training investment allowances and capital redemption allowances. The effect of these exclusions is to protect the additional profits tax base from being reduced by deductions that the legislature considered unsuitable for this special calculation. This distinction is important because an amount may be deductible for ordinary tax purposes but not necessarily deductible when determining additional profits tax.
The concept of “net cash receipts” is the foundation of the entire system. For each year of assessment, the net cash receipts from a special mining lease area are determined by deducting specified amounts from specified income. The result may be either positive or negative.
This is significant because mining projects often produce negative cash positions during exploration and development before sales begin. The schedule allows these early negative positions to be recognised in the calculation so that additional profits tax is not imposed before the project has moved beyond cost recovery and into genuine surplus profitability.
The income included in calculating net cash receipts covers amounts accruing from special mining lease operations in the relevant area. It may also include certain amounts connected to other special mining lease areas where the law permits such treatment. In addition, proceeds from the sale of material, equipment, plant, facilities, data, information, intellectual property or rights may be included where their acquisition costs were previously deducted in calculating net cash receipts.
Amounts of a capital nature, or contributions received from any person for the use of facilities, may also be included if they are not already covered elsewhere. This broad approach prevents taxpayers from excluding significant economic benefits merely because they are not ordinary sales revenue.
On the deduction side, the schedule allows expenditure incurred or deemed to have been incurred by the holder of the special mining lease, provided the Commissioner determines that the expenditure is attributable to the relevant special mining lease area. It also allows income tax paid for the year of assessment on taxable income attributed to the area, as well as capital expenditure incurred solely in relation to the special mining lease area where such expenditure is deductible under the 22nd Schedule. Exploration capital expenditure incurred before the first year of assessment is deemed to have been incurred in the first year of assessment for special mining lease operations and is deducted in full in the year in which it is incurred or deemed incurred.
The schedule also contains rules for holders of more than one special mining lease. Where income cannot be attributed exclusively to one special mining lease area, it may be treated as accruing in equal parts from each of the areas. Where deductions relate to expenditure not incurred exclusively for one area, the deductions must be apportioned between the leases in proportion to the income generated from each special mining lease area. These rules are designed to prevent manipulation of income and expenses between projects.
Without such provisions, a taxpayer could potentially shift costs to a profitable lease area or allocate income in a way that reduces additional profits tax.
The schedule centres on calculating the first and second accumulated net cash positions for a special mining lease area, beginning in the first year of assessment and continuing each year thereafter. The first position is calculated by taking the previous year’s balance, adjusting it by a benchmark rate and the Price Index, and adding current net cash receipts. The default benchmark rate is 15 percent, unless the lease agreement provides otherwise. This acts as a minimum return threshold before additional profits tax applies. The second accumulated net cash position is calculated similarly but uses a higher benchmark rate of 20 percent, unless otherwise agreed. It also deducts any additional profits tax arising from the first position. This creates a higher profitability threshold and gives the regime a progressive structure, allowing cost recovery and ordinary returns before heavier taxation applies.
The Price Index, based on the United States Industrial Goods Producer Price Index reported by the IMF unless replaced by ministerial notice, adjusts for price changes over time. This is important for long-term mining projects. If either accumulated position becomes positive, it is treated as nil for the next year, preventing repeated taxation. Additional profits tax applies to positive balances, with further tax of 27,778 percent on any positive second position.
In conclusion, Zimbabwe’s additional profits tax ensures that special mining lease holders contribute more when projects achieve exceptional profitability. By recognising costs, benchmark returns and price changes, the regime protects investors while securing public revenue. Its progressive structure supports fairness, fiscal stability and responsible exploitation of the country’s mineral resources.
l Hamudi is Tax Partner at Baker Tilly Central Africa, based in Harare, Zimbabwe. He can be contacted at +263 775 399 536 or simbarashe.hamudi@bakertilly.co.zw