Mike E. Juru
AS a nation, we could have missed the event of January 20, 2026, where the United Nations (UN) made a declaration that changes how we must think about water. The United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNUINWEH), the UN’s “think tank on water”, launched its flagship report Global Water Bankruptcy: Living Beyond Our Hydrological Means in the Post-Crisis Era at UN headquarters in New York. Its conclusion is stark: the world has entered an “era of global water bankruptcy”.
This is not another “water crisis” alert. The UN argues that terms like “water stress” and “water crisis” implied temporary shocks followed by recovery. Water bankruptcy is different. It is defined as a post-crisis condition where two things are true: long-term human withdrawals from rivers and aquifers exceed renewable inflows and safe limits, and the resulting depletion causes irreversible or prohibitively costly damage to water-related natural capital.
In plain terms, we have overspent our annual water “income” from rivers, rainfall and snowpack, and we have drained our long-term “savings” in aquifers, glaciers, wetlands and soils. Lead author and director Prof Kaveh Madani states the uncomfortable truth: “Many regions are living beyond their hydrological means, and many critical water systems are already bankrupt”.
The scale is global,
the impact is local
The UN report finds that 75 percent of the global population now lives in countries classified as “water insecure” or “critically water insecure”. Four billion people face severe water scarcity for at least one month each year. Nearly 70 percent of major aquifers show long-term declines. The world has lost 410 million hectares of wetlands ― an area almost the size of the European Union ― and 30 percent of global glacier mass since 1970.
Economic damage from land degradation, groundwater depletion and climate change exceeds US$300 billion annually.
For Zimbabwe, this is not a distant headline. We share the Limpopo and Zambezi basins. Cities like Harare, Bulawayo and Mutare rely heavily on groundwater and surface reservoirs that are increasingly stressed. “Day Zero” scenarios have moved from Cape Town’s 2018 warning to a planning reality across Southern Africa. The UN report notes that droughts and pollution incidents that once looked like temporary shocks are becoming chronic in many places. If we continue to live beyond our hydrological means, we risk compacted aquifers, land subsidence in deltas and cities, vanished wetlands, and water systems that cannot return to historical baselines.
Buildings: Part of the problem, essential to the solution
The built environment is deeply connected to this crisis. Globally, buildings account for roughly 30 percent of freshwater withdrawals and generate significant wastewater. Traditional construction treats water as an unlimited input and an unlimited waste sink. In a bankruptcy era, that model fails.
Green building invert the equation. They shift buildings from water consumers to water managers. For Zimbabwe, three pathways are urgent:
1. Demand reduction through design
Green building standards like Green Star, EDGE and LEED mandate low-flow fixtures, smart metering, efficient cooling towers and water-wise landscaping. A certified commercial building in Harare would cut potable water use by 30-50 percent compared to a conventional building. That is not just cost-saving. It is water left in Lake Chivero, the Manyame catchment and local aquifers. As the UN report urges, we must move from reacting to emergencies to “bankruptcy management” with enforceable limits and transparent water accounting.
2. On-site water capture and reuse
Rainwater harvesting, greywater recycling for flushing and irrigation, and stormwater management systems reduce reliance on stressed municipal supply. In Harare, where supply intermittency is common, buildings with these systems build resilience for tenants and reduce peak demand on Zinwa. Stormwater capture also protects wetlands and groundwater recharge zones instead of channelling runoff into flood channels. This aligns with the UN’s call to protect the natural capital that produces and stores water.
3. Water-positive and regenerative design
The next generation of green buildings goes further: treating and returning cleaner water than they withdraw. On-site treatment, constructed wetlands and water-sensitive urban design can mean a development adds net water value to its catchment. For valuers and financiers, this shifts ESG from compliance to competitive advantage.
The valuer’s lens: pricing water risk under IVS
Under International Valuation Standards, ESG factors that affect cash flows, risk and obsolescence must be considered. Water is now a primary ESG risk. A building with poor water performance faces higher operating costs, regulatory risk as municipalities would tighten bylaws, and reduced bankability as banks apply IFC and Equator Principles screens. Conversely, water-efficient assets show lower vacancy, premium rents and reduced cap rates.
The UN report frames water not only as risk but as “a strategic opportunity in a fragmented world”. For Zimbabwe’s property sector, that opportunity is green building. As valuers, we must now ask clients: What is your building’s water intensity per m²? What is the source risk of your borehole? What happens to value if Harare’s water tariffs double or supply is rationed? Those are IVS questions, not activism.
From acknowledgement to action
Prof Madani concludes: “By acknowledging the reality of water bankruptcy, we can finally make the hard choices that will protect people, economies and ecosystems”. For Zimbabwe, the hard choices are clear:
a). Policy: Enforce water efficiency in national building codes and municipal bylaws. Mandate water sub-metering and disclosure for commercial and public buildings.
b). Finance: Banks and DFIs should require water performance data for lending, just as they now require energy data. Green building certification should unlock better loan terms.
c). Industry: Developers must design for the climate and water reality of 2030, not 1990. Quantity surveyors, architects and engineers must price water efficiency upfront. It is cheaper than retrofitting during a drought.
d). Profession: Valuers must integrate water metrics into ESG reporting and market analysis. Public trust in valuations depends on credibility that includes resource reality.
Conclusion
The UN has declared bankruptcy not to induce despair, but to force honest adaptation. We cannot build our way out of water bankruptcy with 20th-century buildings. We must build as if water were capital ― because in the bankruptcy era, it is the most valuable capital we have.
Green buildings are no longer a luxury or a marketing label. They are water infrastructure. They are risk mitigation. They are Zimbabwe’s contribution to living within our hydrological means.
As valuers, developers and citizens, let us make Zimbabwean property part of the solution. Let us design, finance and value buildings so credible that we earn public trust and unlock capital for a water-secure future. The bankruptcy era demands it. Our children will judge us by what we build next.
l Juru is an accomplished business leader who is the current chairman of the Green Building Council Zimbabwe, Valuers Council of Zimbabwe and CEO of Integrated Properties. Previous national leadership roles include chairman of Institute of Directors Zimbabwe, president of Real Estate Institute of Zimbabwe, inaugural chairman of REITs Association, vice president ZNCC. He has sat on several boards in the private and public sector. He passionately leads the transformation of Zimbabwe’s built environment to sustainability.

